Analyse the sources and draw conclusions.

The second and most important step is to analyse the sources, draw conclusions and conclusions.

In essence, the whole essay should be based on the sources. This is especially true for the long one, where there are 3 sources. Therefore, it is worthwhile to go through the sources before making a choice, not just deciding on the topic and the assignment, because the write essays for money sources and their findings make up about a third of the essay! If you don't understand the source, you can't draw conclusions from it, and you may not even be writing about the events that the answer key asks you to!

Ideally, you should choose the essay when you have encountered all three sources. In other words, we know what or who is in the picture and we feel we can make findings that fit the topic.

Unfortunately, the situation is not always ideal.

So if we come across a source we've never seen before:

1. look at who wrote it, where it comes from, maybe even see the year.
2. read the source several times, interpret it and try to get as much as possible. Put it in the context of the topic, and be sure to write a sentence or two about it, including the source itself, as it is likely to be worth 1 point.34. If it is a map, it will probably be a blank map. Immediately open the atlas and look for the "normal" version, which will give you much more information

Examples:

- 'Map of the ecclesiastical organisation of St Stephen's Hungary' - in this case, be sure to write down that the source shows the new administrative units created by St Stephen, the ecclesiastical duchies, of which he created 10. This is just a description of the source, we economics homework help need to make a statement, that is, we need to write something that follows from it, that is closely related to it. For example: of these there were 2 archdioceses, Esztergom and Kalocsa. And we have already got the full 3 points for this source.
- If we take an excerpt from Bethlen's 1928 speech from the time of Hungary between the two world wars, we can immediately see that it is about the discontent after Trianon. In other words, we have to say that Bethlen found the Trianon peace unacceptable because many Hungarians were displaced across the border. Then we have to think further and conclude that Bethlen's main political ambition was revision, which he wanted to achieve peacefully, and that is why he wanted to join the League of Nations.
- If we can get a diagram, perhaps that will be the greatest help.

Take, for example, a diagram of the organisation of the dualist state. Since this is our source, we can read anything from it and then draw conclusions. Eg: The Austro-Hungarian monarchy became a two-centred dualist state -> with a common ruler and ministries, but each country sending a delegation of 60-60 people to control them. (Essentially, you have scored 3 points with the help of the diagram.)